Hot on HuffPost Travel:

 

Should Lithium Batteries Be Banned from Flights?

by Fran Golden Subscribe to Fran Golden's postsPosted Aug 16th 2010 01:01 PM

TEXT SIZE:

AAA
Among the latest items of concern in airplane passenger cabins are lithium-ion batteries, as found in cell phones, computers and cameras, USA Today reports.

The newspaper says concerns raised by security experts, flight attendants and scientists range from fires to use of the batteries in a terrorist attack.

Data from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) shows in the past 19 years batteries and battery-powered devices were involved in "smoke, fire, extreme heat or explosion" on passenger or cargo planes in at least 113 incidents, the newspaper reports.

Meanwhile, American Airlines confiscated 58 cell phones, lithium-ion batteries and charging devices from a passenger on a New York to Buenos Aires flight in June, worried about a possible terrorist attack.

Dan Abraham, a materials scientist at the Argonne National Laboratory in Illinois, says even one battery could start a fire.

"A smart terrorist can start fires with these things," he tells the newspaper. "Any energy-storage device packs a lot of energy in a small space and can be used for good or evil."

The FAA bans carrying spare batteries in checked bags. And earlier this year, the Transportation Department proposed stricter rules for shipping lithium-ion batteries in cargo holds.

Dinkar Mokadam of the Association of Flight Attendants says that group would also like to see limits established on the number of batteries a passenger can carry on a plane.

A Transportation Security Administration (TSA) spokeswoman tells USA Today the agency has studied the matter, and found the batteries "cannot be used as an explosive and are not a security threat in personal carry-on quantities."



Photo, lrargerich, flickr
Filed Under: News

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

25 Comments

Filter by:
Jim

Yet another sensationalistic "story" about air travel. Reactionary efforts now have us taking only small amounts of fluids and removing our shoes. Think about it. How many people have tried to bring explosives onto a plane in their shoe? One.
The batteries are safer in the checked luggage than they are in the hands of someone. Regardless, they don't pose that big of a threat. And it certainly isn't any more of a threat than the wine bottles in first class.

August 16 2010 at 7:55 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
don

They won't ban them they will just charge $25 for each device or battery. Any reason why we all hate terrorists for what they have done to travel.

August 16 2010 at 7:51 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
guy

Actually, batteries are a very good means to start a fire. All an Obamanite would need is a small pile of paper (Skyway mag) and a paperclip to short the battery. Poof, boom, AHHHH! I like the flying naked idea.

August 16 2010 at 7:24 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
B.P. Dumas

this is more jawbone of a ass stupidity from the airlines and the government, A properly made lithium-ion battery , under very high quality QC procedures will never be a issue,
if the theory is that somone could rig, hotwire, or whatever something like a cell phone battery or any small Li type battery used in any portable electronics,
sure, if you were trained to do so, inclined and otherwise, absolutely. Is it likely.
I doubt it.

Mind you if you're on a plane and whip out some sort of thing which sorta looks like a cellphone battery and its wires or leads soldered to it, and its got alligator clips affixed to those wires ,
well I guess its time for the nearest good guy to spring into aciton and try to take care of business.
But then a proper screening would show this up, unless the person is hiding it where the sun never shines. Everyone remember the thing from pulp fiction where the POW hid the watch up his tush while he imprisoned in the Haoni hiltion there.
I assume theres some pulp fiction fans out there.

August 16 2010 at 7:24 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Neil Edward

Aside from the fact that dealing with airlines, TSA and the lot is a gigantic pain in the butt, I do applaud the idea of Homeland Security and the TSA for trying to protect us.
HOWEVER, until they get off the political correctness kick and begin to PROFILE, the whole thing is a massive circle jerk and make work project. Every "terrorist" I've seen a picture of to date is a dark, swarthy middle-eastern type. That's the fact of the matter.
It may annoy some non-terrorists fitting this description, but what about the annoyance to the rest of us??

August 16 2010 at 6:36 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
BUTTON

NOW IT'S TIME TO BAN WINGS ON PLANES AND BAN WINDOWS NEXT. THEN BAN FLIGHT ATTENDANTS AND PASSENGERS. WAY TO GO FFA AND WHOEVER ELSE.

August 16 2010 at 6:28 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Nena

First, let me comment on how INAPPROPRIATE the photograph that accompanies this story is...looks like a jet about to hit buildings. How SENSITIVE AOL!

Second, by all means take our batteries. You've already taken my contact lens solution (in a regulation sized bottle), a beautiful beaded outfit that I wore to a wedding (disappeared from my luggage and replaced with one of those TSA "notes" saying my bag had been searched) a necklace and bracelet (went missing after TSA saw it in my purse and "searched" it), made me partially disrobe when the scanner was malfnctioning, patted me down in an inappropriate way, and told me "too bad" when I missed my flight because of YOUR incompetence. So yea, go ahead and take my batteries...maybe you can install them in your brain in an effort to knock it out of "stupid" gear! On second thought, put them up your rear ends because that seems to be the only place any thought originates from the airlines.

August 16 2010 at 6:07 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
PB

People travel on planes to go on vacation. What do they take with them on vacation? Cameras!! What do those cameras run on batteries. This would be a rediculous law if passed. Enough is enough FAA.

August 16 2010 at 5:45 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
henry sena

this is another joke. first i am not ready to give up my fredoms that my uncles died in ww2 for. i have no fear of terriosts. they use this for everything they want to change. for that matter the last two terriost one tries to light c4 with a lighter and has no chance of doing it. then we have the guy sets his gentials on fire. if this is the training they are getting its great. the guy in times square didnot know what it takes to set off a propane tank. all these guys are jokes

August 16 2010 at 5:40 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
hank

Coming next: Naked flying. Seems to me, the only way to make passengers totally free from potential threats is to have everyone fly naked and have a 2nd plane carry all the bags and the like. Then again the airlines might have to issue blinders or eye covers--some of us might be too unnerving naked...lol

August 16 2010 at 5:15 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Hot 5 Deals

The Hot 5 Deals & Discount Travel.
Get top travel deals to compare and save money.

Link Love

Associated Press

Which cards are the best to travel with?

Take These Cards

Travel Buzz

Getty Images

Drive up to these 10 cool restaurants.

Great Road Grub
Getty

Read the 25 best travel books of all time.

Best of the Books
Getty Images

Six locales where getting lost is the best way to explore.

Where to Lose Yourself

Around the web

  • Even when you're traveling, follow what's going on in your neighborhood.
    Get the Patch app.
  • .